Bolzano/Bozen, Göttingen, 29. November 2006
The Society for Threatened Peoples (GfbV) condemned as a
serious blow for the human rights work for indigenous peoples on
Wednesday the postponing of the passing of the "General
Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples" by the UN
General Assembly. The Human Rights Committee of the UN General
Assembly meeting in New York on Tuesday had postponed this point
on the agenda at the request of some African countries to
September 2007 in order to be able to discuss further wishes for
modifications on the part of individual states. "The United
Nations have frivolously thrown away a chance to set a clear
signal against the marginalisation and disenfranchisement of 350
million native people", criticised the GfbV. "We cannot
understand the need for more time for modification wishes. After
all, the fundamental declaration on the human rights of
indigenous peoples was passed 24 years ago."
"Today is a very sad day for the United Nations and for the
credibility of the newly founded Human Rights Council, which had
formally asked the General Assembly to pass this historic
document", said Grand Chief Ed John, the spokesperson of the
"Indigenous Caucus", the diplomatic representative of the
indigenous peoples at the UN in New York. "It now looks as though
the United Nations will never officially pass this Statement.
This is a surprising and grotesque development", said Ed
John.
The present draft of a General Statement on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples deals in nine sections with many rights of the
approximately 5,000 indigenous peoples throughout the world. It
deals among others with the right to self-determination of
indigenous peoples, their participation in state organisations
and their nationality and contains a prohibition on
discrimination. The Declaration covers the protection of their
linguistic, cultural and spiritual identity, as well as their
rights in the fields of education, society and the economy.
Particularly important are the requirements concerning the land
rights of indigenous peoples, including their rights to the
mineral deposits. The Declaration on the rights of the indigenous
also lays down that they must be included in all decisions
concerning their future and development.
Finland had spoken in the name of the European Union for the
Declaration to be passed and warned against a further
postponement of the vote. However it was not only African states,
but also New Zealand, Canada and Australia which called for a
postponement of the vote. The USA, which had expressed
considerable reservations on the Declaration, abstained from the
vote. The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva had recommended to
the General Assembly on 29th June 2006 that the Declaration be
passed.